Unlocking Operational Capacity with Fully Digitalized Cleaning Validation

Kenneth Pierce

Author

Kenneth Pierce

Director of Product, Process, and Cleaning Validation Lifecycle

ValGenesis

LinkedIn

Published on January 22, 2026
Reading time: -- minutes
Last updated on January 22, 2026
Reviewed by: Lisa Weeks

Summary

Cleaning validation (CV) is often treated as a burden rather than a contributor to operational performance. This post examines why legacy, paper-based approaches persist, how they reinforce over-cleaning and hidden losses in overall equipment effectiveness, and how digitalized, lifecycle-based cleaning validation can transform compliance activities into a source of efficiency, scalability, and continuous improvement across pharmaceutical manufacturing.

Key Takeaways

  • Manual CV slows preparation, execution, and approval, and pushes teams toward conservative “over-cleaning” strategies that embed recurring losses in overall equipment effectiveness (OEE). 
  • Regulators expect documented, traceable, science- and risk-based lifecycle control; digital workflows strengthen version control, traceability, data integrity, and inspection readiness. 
  • Digital execution plus integrations (LIMS/MES/ERP) make ongoing verification, change management, and scaling across sites faster — and builds a strong foundation for Pharma 4.0 and ML-driven monitoring. 

Who is this for

  • Cleaning validation and CQV engineers 
  • Quality assurance and compliance leaders 
  • Manufacturing operations and production managers 
  • Process development and tech transfer teams 
  • CSV / 21 CFR Part 11 / EU GMP Annex 11 and data integrity specialists 
  • Digital transformation, MES/LIMS integration, and automation leaders 
  • Site leaders responsible for capacity, schedule recovery, and inspection readiness 
featured image

Despite broader advances in digitalization across qualification and validation lifecycles, cleaning validation frequently remains dependent on spreadsheets, PDFs, and manual workflows. It is often seen as a “necessary evil” and assigned a low priority during new process or product introductions, facility startups, or schedule recovery efforts — precisely when its impact on operational capacity is greatest. 

In these scenarios, cleaning validation (CV) is frequently treated as an activity to be completed with low resource intensity, minimal development, and a “nuclear” approach designed to ensure passing results the first time. When schedules compress, it is often the first element cut. The resulting outcomes are not a reflection of CV teams’ capabilities or intent, but of a systemic perception that cleaning is a zero-sum activity that consumes overall equipment effectiveness (OEE), rather than an opportunity — with minimal investment — to free significant percentages of OEE in new or existing manufacturing paradigms.

Why Cleaning Validation Is Still Seen as a Burden

Legacy paper-based approaches are poorly defined, time-consuming, error-prone, and ill-suited to today’s regulatory and operational demands. These approaches burden both CV and Operations with slow, exception-inducing processes that require significant effort to prepare, pre-approve, execute, and post-approve. 

More critically, paper-based methods limit the ability to observe, learn, react, update, and maintain a constant state of readiness. Preparation delays prevent subject matter experts from achieving efficient, optimized cleaning cycles and force execution teams to rely on maximal, conservative cleaning strategies. This ingrains inefficiency — and OEE consumption — into the system. Senior stakeholders, faced with the risk of delay, often accept ongoing losses rather than experiment with process limits, further reinforcing the status quo. 

Modern, fully digitalized cleaning validation represents more than a technology upgrade. It is a strategic shift that directly impacts batch throughput, inspection readiness, and scalability. When CV processes are aligned with Pharma 4.0 principles, compliance gaps are reduced, equipment downtime is minimized, and lifecycle continuity becomes achievable.

Regulatory Expectations Demand a Lifecycle Approach

Regulators such as the FDA, EMA, and WHO expect cleaning validation to be documented, traceable, and aligned with a science- and risk-based lifecycle approach (FDA, 2011; EMA, 2015; WHO, 2014). Manual or semi-automated methods frequently fall short, resulting in gaps in traceability, version control issues, and outdated protocols dispersed across facilities. 

Lifecycle expectations begin with the assumption that manufacturers will have a science-based logic for setting cleaning parameters and cleaning agent selection. This typically includes the completion of cleaning studies, risk assessments that evaluate process intermediates and equipment characteristics, and clear traceability from development through execution. Digitalized risk assessment and study management allow direct linkage between these inputs and defined cleaning parameters, stages, and monitoring criteria (EMA, 2015; ICH, 2005). 

Worst-case rationale must also be rigorously defined and continuously challenged. Data-backed business rules should drive consistent product and equipment grouping strategies, while still allowing site-level SMEs to incorporate experiential knowledge into sampling plan development. Digitalization enables this balance between standardization and flexibility.

Building Audit Readiness From the Start

A digitalized approach to cleaning program development helps mitigate common inspection findings, including insufficient documentation of development activities, inadequate rationale for residue limits, and gaps in data integrity. System-mandated actions and enforced workflows ensure that critical steps are completed, justified, and traceable throughout the lifecycle. 

At a fundamental level, digital processes eliminate data integrity deficiencies such as missing audit trails, incomplete metadata, and untraceable electronic signatures. Alignment between corporate policies and site-level execution is maintained through structured frameworks that govern task activation and outcome achievement across the lifecycle.

Accelerating Execution Without Compromising Compliance

At-scale execution of cleaning process qualification and validation is one of the most time- and resource-intensive activities a manufacturing site undertakes. Legacy approaches inhibit the ability to execute efficiently. Protocols must be printed, distributed, manually completed, recollected, and sequentially reviewed — introducing delays, errors, and complexity. 

Fully digitalized execution eliminates these challenges. Digital protocols are instantly accessible, data is captured in real time, and completeness is enforced before task closure. Evidence is permanently attached, audit trails are always on, and electronic records and signatures are governed by Part 11 and Annex 11 controls. Review and approval workflows can begin immediately upon task completion, dramatically shortening timelines. 

This level of execution efficiency allows project teams to confidently pursue cleaning process optimization from the start of production, rather than deferring improvements due to fear of disruption.

Legacy Program OEE Optimization

Legacy cleaning programs often rely on over-cleaning strategies designed to account for worst-case outcomes. While effective from a compliance standpoint, this approach ensures that cleaning consumes significant operational time indefinitely.  

Once facilities are in production, retrospective optimization is rarely pursued. Reassessing cleaning processes typically requires additional studies, risk assessments, verification activities, and revalidation runs — efforts that are typically labor-intensive and difficult to execute on schedule using traditional, non-digital approaches. Combined with supply chain commitments extending months into the future, stakeholders may accept known inefficiencies to avoid disruption, even when long-term OEE gains are possible.

The impact of this dynamic becomes clear when examining time-loss patterns across lower-performing facilities. As shown in Figures 1 and 2 below, cleaning-related losses represent a significant portion of planned production time in both biologics and chemical drug substance manufacturing. In biologics facilities, cleaning accounts for more than 11 percent of lost production time, while in chemical API operations, cleaning-related losses can reach 25 percent — showing that cleaning is a systemic source of lost capacity, rather than a small, isolated inefficiency.

In-Text-Graphics-NEW-[BP]-Unlocking-Operational-Capacity-with-Fully-Digitalized-Cleaning-Validation-LW-EDIT

 

Digitalized cleaning validation changes this dynamic by enabling rapid execution, real-time visibility, and consistent documentation. The time required to reassess, adjust, and revalidate cleaning processes is significantly reduced, making optimization feasible without jeopardizing supply commitments. Over time, this allows facilities to reclaim lost OEE and remain competitive within global networks.

Enabling Ongoing Verification and Knowledge Management

Ongoing verification and optimization are critical phases of the cleaning validation lifecycle. Data collected over time must be monitored to identify opportunities for efficiency while ensuring that drift from validated design spaces is avoided. 

Digitalized systems support integration with LIMS, MES, and ERP platforms, enabling structured data exchange and lifecycle continuity. These integrations are foundational for effective knowledge management, allowing organizations to capture, share, and reuse insights across programs and sites.

Change management is similarly streamlined. Risk assessments, impact analyses, and program updates can be performed efficiently, with immediate visibility into the implications for residue limits, worst-case strategies, and validation status — without manual spreadsheet analysis or document reconciliation.

Scalability and Standardization

Scalability is essential for global life sciences organizations. Digitalized cleaning validation enables centralized governance of templates, frameworks, and business rules while preserving local flexibility through documented justification. Global oversight teams gain real-time visibility into site-level differences, enabling proactive involvement where necessary. 

Shared knowledge databases further reduce variability and shorten validation timelines. Programs can inherit risk assessments, cleaning strategies, and historical data, accelerating onboarding and reducing redundancy across the network.

Looking Ahead: Pharma 4.0 and AI Integration

The digitalization of a cleaning validation program lays the foundation for the next phase of industry evolution: alignment with Pharma 4.0 principles and the integration of artificial intelligence. As facilities move toward operating models where data and control systems are fully connected, digitalized cleaning validation enables the structured collection of equipment and process data directly into validation systems, without the risk of transcription errors (ISPE, 2023). 

Beyond execution efficiency, the greatest impact of this connectivity is realized in ongoing program maintenance and optimization. Digital systems can continuously compile cleaning performance information, generate defined interval reports, and support increasingly sophisticated monitoring criteria to ensure consistent outcomes over time. As datasets grow, these capabilities allow organizations to move beyond static verification models toward dynamic, data-driven oversight.

With the addition of machine learning, digitalized cleaning validation systems can begin to identify when baselines have shifted, when process capability has narrowed, or when variability is increasing — even before results trigger formal out-of-specification investigations. Over time, AI-enabled analytics may also support recommendations for cleaning cycle adjustments by examining historical endpoints and outcomes, highlighting where processes consistently operate close to failure thresholds or where conservative margins may be safely optimized. 

As these capabilities mature, data analytics can further inform opportunities to lengthen revalidation and requalification intervals and better align maintenance strategies, shifting from preventative approaches toward more predictive models. In this way, Pharma 4.0 and AI integration extend the value of digital cleaning validation beyond compliance, enabling continuous improvement while maintaining control over validated design spaces.

Repositioning Cleaning Validation as a Strategic Enabler 

Modernizing cleaning validation with a fully digitalized approach is both a compliance necessity and a business opportunity. By embedding science- and risk-based practices throughout the lifecycle, organizations can strengthen data integrity, maintain continuous audit readiness, and unlock operational agility

Ultimately, digitalization repositions cleaning validation from a perceived burden into a strategic enabler of efficiency, competitiveness, and increased output — supporting both today’s regulatory expectations and the future of pharmaceutical manufacturing.

 

Go deeper into digital cleaning validation. 
Download the full Industry Insight: Unlocking Operational Capacity with Fully Digitalized Cleaning Validation to explore regulatory expectations, real-world OEE impacts, and how digitalization transforms cleaning validation from a compliance burden into a strategic advantage.

tn_IS_Unlocking Operational Capactiy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents

    References

    1

    European Commission. (2015). https://www.gmp-compliance.org/guidelines/gmp-guideline/eu-gmp-annex-15-qualification-and-validation

    EudraLex—Volume 4: EU guidelines for good manufacturing practice for medicinal products for human and veterinary use, Annex 15: Qualification and validation. Publications Office of the European Union. Accessed Date: 12 December 2025.

    2

    Food and Drug Administration. (2011). https://www.fda.gov/media/71021/download

    Process validation: General principles and practices . Accessed Date: 16 December 2025.

    3

    International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. (2005). https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q9_Guideline.pdf

    ICH Q9: Quality risk management.. Accessed Date: 16 December 2025.

    4

    International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering. (2023). https://ispe.org/publications/guidance-documents/baseline-guide-vol-8-pharma-40-1st-edition

    ISPE Baseline® Guide: Pharma 4.0™ (Vol. 8). Accessed Date: 08 January 2026.

    5

    World Health Organization. (2014). https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/trs986-annex2

    WHO good manufacturing practices for pharmaceutical products: Main principles (WHO Technical Report Series No. 986, Annex 2). publication. Accessed Date: 09 January 2026.

    The opinions, information and conclusions contained within this blog should not be construed as conclusive fact, ValGenesis offering advice, nor as an indication of future results.

    Related Blog Posts